1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Believers against the War

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Salty, Dec 18, 2009.

  1. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,034
    Likes Received:
    1,497
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks on September 11, 2001, nor was their any threat to the United States from Iraq.
     
  2. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,034
    Likes Received:
    1,497
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Amen! :thumbs:
     
  3. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,034
    Likes Received:
    1,497
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Germany declared war on the United States after Japan attacked us at Pearl Harbor. Then we declared war back.
     
    #43 KenH, Dec 18, 2009
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2009
  4. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,034
    Likes Received:
    1,497
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I wouldn't bet on it.
     
  5. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,034
    Likes Received:
    1,497
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I agree; however, invading Iraq was not one of those and the war in Afghanistan started off that way but no longer is.
     
  6. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not exactly. They didn't delare war on us until Dec 11th 1941. We were supplying troops to fight alongside the Brits long before that.

    In the very least, if a simple declaration of war against the US warrants us being involved, then no one should have any problem with our current involvement in Afghanistan.
     
  7. Thinkingstuff

    Thinkingstuff Active Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,248
    Likes Received:
    9
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    But Saddam insulted and threatened George's daddy. Couldn't sit by and let that happen. Imagine if Saddam said something agianst George's mother!!!! We'd be looking at a vast desert of green glass rather than a country.
     
  8. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,034
    Likes Received:
    1,497
    Faith:
    Baptist
    1) Any minimal amount of troops to Great Britain did not justify Germany declaring war on the United States.

    2) When did the government of Afghanistan declare war on the United States? And regardless of why we went into Afghanistan any such justification has been used up.
     
  9. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,360
    Likes Received:
    134
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Actually, it isn't that Saddam insulted George Bush, it's that an assasination plot against Bush was traced back to Saddam.

    Assasinating a head of state or plotting to assasinate a head of state, under international law, is considered to be an act of war.
     
  10. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Saddam broke the cease fire. We were still at war with Iraq since 1991. But then you already knew that.
     
  11. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,360
    Likes Received:
    134
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Correct. Saddam broke the cease-fire as defined in UN Resolution 1441 (and he didn't just break it, he went out of his way to thumb his nose at every stipulation in the cease fire).

    The problem is that the cease fire was between Saddam and coalition forces under the UN, not with the US, so I don't believe that Saddam's actions were a good reason for the US to go. I don't buy any of the "cowboy", "unilateral" nonsense. The truth is that we went into Iraq either with or with support from more than 40 other countries. But be that as it were, it just wasn't our responsibility, nor did we have Constitutional authority to do it.

    It was a colossal mistake and I truly regret having supported it.
     
  12. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I am sorry for your misinformation. There was no unilateral action taken with regard to Iraq. There was no real need to even go back to the UN on the matter. And the only reason the UN had such problems with it was because many were getting rich on the oil for food program. The whole thing has become corrupt.
     
  13. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe the troop support we gave to Europe was several thousand, but that's a side issue. We've already established that if someone declared war on us, then waging war on them is permissible.
    They did so defacto via Al Queda's attack on 9-11. Congress authorized the Afghanistan war just days after 9-11.
    Not so. It took 4 years to topple Germany's government, and we remained in Germany an additional decade or so after that. Our time in Afghanistan has been relatively short compared to that.
     
  14. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,360
    Likes Received:
    134
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Um...which part of "I don't buy any of the 'cowboy', 'unilateral' nonsense. The truth is that we went into Iraq either with or with support from more than 40 other countries" did you not get?

    I agree completely. The fact remains, though, that we didn't have the Constitutional authority to invade Iraq, nor was it our responsibility to do it.
     
  15. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, we did. The POTUS is constitutionally granted the right of being commander in chief of the armed forces. Additionally, Congress authorized the Persian Gulf War on September 14, 2001, and the Iraq War on October 16, 2002, in accordance with the Constitution granting Congress the power to declare war.
     
  16. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,360
    Likes Received:
    134
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The Constitution gives Congress the authority to declare war and to authorize the president to execute a war.

    However, nothing in the Constitution justified Congress' decision to do that.
     
  17. pinoybaptist

    pinoybaptist Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    8,136
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is the age of "nothing is what it seems to be", jdf.
     
  18. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's what we call a:
    [​IMG]
     
  19. billwald

    billwald New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    2
    Germany declared war on the US because of their mutual defense treaty with Japan.
     
  20. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist

    The words "Declare War" do not have to be used. Authorizing the use of force is the same thing.
     
Loading...