Approaches to vaccines part 2

Aarons thread is closed, the reason given, Aaron is no longer active. There are others who are no longer active. The reasons very often become that someone is accused of lying. I have seen the same game played more often than I’d like to remember.

Some here will remember RevMitchell, after all he was one of the top contributors in the history of this board. I nicknamed him ‘The General’. Like some others who possessed the highest integrity, he left on his own. Here is an example of why he left.


JonC said: ↑
I have a question, Mitch. In your opinion is it wrong to lie about other people. I ask because we live in a culture where "truth" is subjective. Some believe they can say whatever they want about people and it is not morally wrong because it is their "opinion".

Anyway, back to the topic.

I did say (and believe) that a church has the right to be informed (like I said, by the acquitted minister) if the minister had been accused of child molestation. The church needs to know the case was investigated and the minister found not guilty.
Like @Reynolds points out these charges, regardless of outcome, harms reputations (the accused and the churches). I believe ministers should be open and honest about issues that may affect the church.

Now, I am not sure why you think I said that I believe the innocent should be stigmatized for the rest of their life. I certainly do not recall ever thinking that, much less saying it.

You must have been reading something else and just got confused. It happens.

Being honest and open does not mean one is stigmatized. But the innocent will still carry that burden with him or her, I agree with @Reynolds on that.

Personally, I think background checks should be run on all staff. I also believe churches should have strict policies in place. Too often accusations have been ignored because people simply think the accused couldn't do that. But rarely, it seems, for these cases in churches involve a minister in tank top driving an ice cream truck.
Click to expand...~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well i havent lied that is the way your posts read. Im not the only one. However, if you want to talk about lying then lets talk about all the lies you told about anyone who opposed the false info from our government about china, covid, or the shots.


Further, your posts are so convoluted its often hard to gain any understanding. I at one time tried to defend your convoluted posts when all the calvies came after you. I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt when they wouldnt. Turned out to be a mistake. Your hostile and vitriolic accusations during covid showed me the light. Not to mention the dishonesty. You dont have any credibility. Good luck with that

#74
Revmitchell, Sunday at 9:04 PM
Tools

 

The most damaging paper of the pandemic has just been published in The Lancet
I was right. The COVID vaccines have killed massive numbers of people and the government covered it up. The paper, published as a pre-print, shows 74% of deaths post-vax due to the vax.
STEVE KIRSCH
JUL 5


SHARE


Head on over to Peter McCullough’s Substack for the details and please consider subscribing to his Substack. He’s terrific, a great friend, a great scientist, and a man of great courage.

This is a pre-print so not yet peer-reviewed.

I’m sure they will try to get this paper killed. It is amazing that The Lancet is a teller of truth in this case.

The paper, published as a pre-print, shows 74% of deaths post-vax could be attributed to the vaccine being a cause of death.

The results are strongly consistent with the Schwab paper where 71% of the deaths appeared to be consistent with a vaccine death:

They basically were looking for the “cleanest” proof of death, but it’s likely that all 71% of the cases (25 out of 35) died from the vaccine, it’s just harder to “prove” that.

 

Anyone heard of ICAN? Yeoman.

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2023/July/PDF/the-pandemic-of-lies-pdf.pdf