Frontal Attack?

One of the most memorable lines from the recent Trump rally was "I took a bullet for Democracy."

Perhaps a tad of an overstatement, but he was making his case before the voters.

Contrast this with the primary season orchestrated by the Democrat Party. Did those endorsing President Biden not know of his mental decline? Unlikely. Thus the suppression of the information from the Primary voters was a direct frontal attack on democracy.

Consider Vice President Harris. Was she so dense she did not notice Mr. Biden's growing inability to express complete sentences? Or if she knew he was heading toward the inability for effectively function as President, she engaged in another frontal attack on democracy.

 

The godless left frequently charges their opponents with the very malfeasance they are perpetrating. Mr. Trump is said to be a threat to democracy according the talking point of the Left's spokespersons.

So the probably reality is the Left is actually the threat to democracy. Which administration suppressed the information about Mr. Biden's acuity decline? The Left. Which administration tried to take Mr. Trump off ballots? The Left. Which administration lied to the voters concerning the fact that more security was requested by the Trump campaign before the shooting? The Left.

No need to go on and on.

 

As last year's SCOTUS term came to an end, three rulings of common sense restored a measure of justice to our wayward government.

1) Discriminating against Asians for the benefit of Blacks is unconstitutional.

2) Forcing believers to augment non-belief violates the right of free speech.

3) The claim a law for one purpose authorized the President to use it for another purpose (Loan Forgiveness) is unconstitutional.

The frontal attack on our representative democracy by the left leaning Democratic Party seems obvious, yet the mainstream media seems unable or unwilling to report the malfeasance. When fascists took control of governments in the 1930s, two means were used to subvert democracy and install totalitarian dictatorships, scapegoating (the Jews were said to be the cause of hardship) and false-flag deception, a fire was set at a government building and the act was blamed on the opponents of the future dictator.

Now we see Mr Trump being scapegoated by the Left and January 6 blamed on him. The parallels are not just interesting, they should be terrifying.

 

Another well worn tactic of the Left is to claim something said is just horrible, it crosses the line, it demonstrates the person who said it is evil.

Recall the 1964 Presidential campaign where Mr. Goldwater said, "“Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue?" The left tried to make the statement anathema.

Or Mr. Trump referring to a "bloodbath" as if he had threaten one?

They do it all the time, misrepresenting sarcasm as literal, or a humorous statement as if factual. Take Mr. Trump saying in affect Christians need to vote this time to stop the government's attack on Christianity, but since his administration will fix the problem, Christians will not need to vote concerning that issue subsequently.

Anyone who thinks the Left's media lap dogs present reality has another think coming.