Featured Hillary doesnt care

If she announced on TV, would you say the same ("doesn't care about people who do not have access to tv"), or a newspaper? ("doesn't care about people who do not have access to the newspaper").

This is simply stupid. Do you really think that it won't be broadcast through every available method?

 

It took Ronald Reagan five years to mention the word AIDS in public. Did that mean that he didn't care about people with AIDS?

Ted Cruz announced his bid for the White House on Twitter? Does he care about folks who don't have access to the net?

In a cookout with Mitt & Ann in Stratham, NH in 2012, Mitt Romney announced his bid for the Presidency. Did that mean he didn't care about people who weren't on that farm that day.

Yours is just a ridiculously foolish statement to make.

You don't have to like her. But don't start making stuff up.

 

I hope that she is not our next President. However, the same geniuses who elected Obama twice will probably elect Hillary Clinton. And the Repugnicans will fail to put somebody up against her who can win. Congratulations, America.

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk

 

Salty, she knew she would get press coverage on TV and on the radio by announcing via the Net. She gets more coverage for less money, maybe no money spent. More bang for the buck you might say.

 

If she is our next she will be our last unless Obama does it first!

 

Personally I think she is a liar and the mother of liars!

 

:laugh:

Well, it's her campaign so she can launch it when and how she want to and I think she can win not just the nomination but the office but still:

https://youtu.be/0uY7gLZDmn4

:laugh:


looks like a long insurance commercial -multicultural, politically correct beyond belief and Hillary should be featured more in her own ad but maybe that's just me. It is hilarious, though.

:laugh:

 

Your reply certainly has nothing to do with this tread. Try responding rationally to the topic of the thread.

 

Do you realize how ridiculous it is to ask OldRegular to respond rationally? :laugh:

 

It's time for a woman to be President...

And Hillary is close enough! :laugh:

 

A man following the lead of a woman gets us kicked out the Garden.
No we might get ushered into eternity by men having to follow the lead of another woman.

Irony at its best.

 

Have you not heard the Good News?

 

You two, professing Christians, support the party that celebrates the slaughter of the unborn child and yet talk about being rational.

 

Lot of people thought it was time for a black to be president and look what happened! Eight, not seven, years of great tribulation!

 

Salty,

Crabby got his feelings hurt. Said I did not respond to the OP so I am responding! Hillary, like Obama, is the ultimate narcissist; she cares for no one but herself! Now I hope Crabby will dry his baby blues or browns or greens or bloodshot eyes!

 

You're a liar. Show where I've ever supported the Democrats. I have never voted for a Democrat in my entire life.. Prove your claim or retract your statement.

 

You support birth, but not life. Once born your motto is let them suffer, they deserve nothing.

And again, you do not stick to the OP. I guess that is asking too much.

So far I am not excited about any of the lessors who say they want to be president, especially the GOP hawks who want war and thus the killing of more young Americans.

 

He won't. You'll have to ignore that the GOP ain't that great when it comes to abortion either in order to get him to retract that.

 

Yes, I had heard that Hillary is a woman, also. She announced the way that she did because she is not too good with people and large crowds.