It's absolutely inconsistent. But that's a topic for another thread. And if you say religionist, I stay with the Bible. If that makes me a religionist then I wear it with a badge of honor.
Is a Presbyterian church much different?
Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by Duckie, Apr 1, 2022.
Page 2 of 3
-
Reformed1689 Well-Known Member
-
[add]
15 And when she was baptized, and her household, she besought us, saying, If ye have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come into my house, and abide there. And she constrained us.
33 And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, immediately. Acts 16
There is a case to be made that children were included in in some of these baptisms. -
-
The title of this thread is:
Is a Presbyterian church much different?
This the OP in Post # 1
If you want to continue just on Baptism - start a new thread. -
Admin note:
See post # 24 -
-
-
I know I'm a little new but I consider myself an Anabaptist by definition, even if I shed the Mennonite garb, so baptism is a relevant point for me.
I don't mind. -
Lets try this one LAST TIME - the OP is about being/attending Presbyterian Church - lets stay on subject!!!! -
It would be relevant if you considered what anabaptist (meaning rebaptizer) is.
An·a·bap·tism
[ˌanəˈbapˌtizəm]
NOUN
- the doctrine that baptism should only be administered to believing adults, held by a radical Protestant sect that emerged during the 1520s and 1530s.
The commenters here are not at fault. That is why I asked about another denomination I didn't know about. Theological differences. -
Marooncat79 Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
The ARP and the OP mirror the PCA. They are more so better in most cases since they do not allow some of the issues to surface than the PCA. Ex: women preaching, the so called worship wars and LGBT issues -
-
-
5 point Gillinist Active Member
-
-
-
-
5 point Gillinist Active Member
-
-
Page 2 of 3