Yet another post addressing the poster and not the topic.
KJVO folks read between the lines to find their English translation was the only one preserved by providence.
Calvinists read between the lines to find numerous false doctrines.
Because the poster, you, posted something irrelevant, an Anti-Calvinism comment, to the topic which is about KJV onlyism. Not every topic needs you to dead horsewhip Calvinism. Are you understanding now?
I once heard someone make the argument using Psalm 12:6, citing the part where it says "like gold refined seven times" and that because the KJV is the seventh English translation of the bible (I didn't even bother to look into that) that it is the true translation. This was one of the most absurd.
Kent Hovind (a disgraced creationist advocate) is also KJVO and said that all the non TR manuscripts were found in Egypt, and due to them being in "good" condition that meant that people didn't use them because they weren't any good. He also claimed that they were gnostic corruptions, therefore why they hadn't been used.
Van cut the junk, you call names, ignore posts, and focus on posters all the time. I asked you a question based on your post. So quit deflecting. And no, you do not learn from your mistakes and NEVER admit your error. You prove that every day on this forum.
Yet another rule violation, another personal attack post.
This is how the false doctrine of Calvinism is defended.
Question, what doctrines of Calvinism are in error.
I say the T, U, L, and I are in error.
The P comes close enough to "once saved always saved" to be considered valid.
Question, what translation choices in the KJB are in error.
I say it is full of less than the best choices from Genesis to Revelation.
I've known @Van since March 2011 and he ain't changed a lick. Calvinist hatred is a deep sickness with some of these people. Makes one wonder what has occurred in their lives to bring such hatred about.