The Insanity of the "right" to have guns! II

Since you obviously know nothing of guns, you would be amazed at how fast a gang of killers run for their lives when their victims start shooting back.

peace to you

 

If you show it, be ready to use it.

peace to you

 

I wouldn't take my family into an area with gangs of killers.

Peace to you

 

When you say only use NT examples, you remove great victories and teachings in Christ in the OT applicable to today.

I Sam 14:6 says, And Jonathan said to the young man that bare his armour, Come and let us go over to the garrison of these uncircumcised, it may be that the Lord will work for us: for there is no restraint of the Lord, to save by many or few."

Jonathan and his armour bearer slew 20 Philistines by the hand of the Lord. Did they go up without weapons to do the work of the Lord? Did they not have faith? This is what happened when the mob of killers sought to kill the righteous.

Many who have guns in the United States are not even covenantly associated with the body of Christ. To lump in the actions of the ungodly with the members of Christ is to bring a slander upon the righteous.

To disarm those who responsibly use their firearms would open up law abiding citizen to a slaughter.

The problem with in the United States is that judgment and justice are not carried out. The leftist liberal polices of lawlessness under to guise of social justice reform has created a disaster here because of their ungodliness.

As I said before, if I must die because I take a stand for Christ, that is something I must do rightly for his kingdom.

To die because of being attacked by a mob of the wicked is something I do not plan to do.

In closing, isn't it ironic that the same armed American people who were freed from the tyranny of the oppresor Great Britian, is the same nation that helped prevent England from becoming a Nazi occupied land. Yet you still want to disarm us.

 

...turn off the TV and go on to bed, I don't care for those kinds of movies...

 

So...Gideon 2.0...
Or Jonathan and his body guard vs the Philistines...

Why do you assume this is an either or scenario when it can be a both scenario.

A gun is not an evil tool. How it gets used can be for both evil and good. Somehow you want the tool to only be used by evil people and imagine that is what is best for society. Why do you celebrate evil doers using guns and imagine that Godly persons are evil if they have and use a gun? In your world it seems you would condemn David as having no faith for carrying a sling with 5 rocks.

 

Perhaps your second question is not actually a simple one, and perhaps it involves use of the fallacy of false dilemma. You only offered two options when they may be others such as doing both. While calling on our great God, someone could take action to do all that they can to try to protect their family. Almighty God could use one or two to deliver from a much larger gang.

According to your own example, it would be likely that those who murder as a living would murder all the ones that they mug in order not to leave any witnesses who could testify concerning their crimes. If they did not intent to murder everyone, perhaps they could plan to use or sell the wife and children as sex slaves.
Perhaps your question could be countered or answered with another question: would you suggest that you would rather trust your family to the evil intentions of a gang of murderers instead of making any effort to protect them?

 

It was Anglo persecution that ultimately drove Christians to brave the perils of the New World and escape from England.

 

Stupid question. That scenario does not statistically happen. In probable self defense scenarios, my likelihood of successfully defending myself from attack, by my possessing a gun, is very high.

 

And we ran y'all out for a good reason. You do not value freedom.