Westminster Confession Of Faith And The Fall Of Man

Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by AndyMartin, May 27, 2017.

  1. AndyMartin Active Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    31
    Faith:
    Baptist
    THE WESTMINSTER CONFESSION OF FAITH (1646)

    "Our first parents, begin seduced by the subtlety and temptations of Satan, sinned in eating the forbidden fruit. This their sin God was pleased, according to his wise and holy counsel, to permit, having purposed to order it to his own glory." (Chapter 6)

    So, it PLEASED God to permit Adam and Eve to sin against Him by disobeying Him, and then He punishes them!

    God "ORDERED" that they sinned!!!

    "Pleased" = "Feeling or showing pleasure and satisfaction, especially at an event or a situation" (Oxford Dictionary)

    The meaning of "please" in 1586 was, "to be agreeable, to give pleasure". Which would have been the meaning at the time this Confession was made!

    This is PERVERSE! This is CALVINISM!
     
  2. MennoSota Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2017
    Messages:
    2,727
    Likes Received:
    443
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Your comprehension is poor, which is partly responsible for your bigotry.

    God chose not to destroy Adam and Eve instantly. God had a plan to display grace. He started that act of grace with Adam and Eve.

    Somehow by your twisted pretzel logic, you end up despising the acknowledgement of grace expressed in the Confession.

    Please, Andy, get a clue before posting.
     
  3. AndyMartin Active Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    31
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Please READ what it actually written and not what you THINK!
     
  4. MennoSota Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2017
    Messages:
    2,727
    Likes Received:
    443
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I read the confession. Your take on it is not what the Confession is saying. You're wasting people's time with your foolishness.
     
  5. AndyMartin Active Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    31
    Faith:
    Baptist
    no one asked you to view/comment! :Biggrin:rolleyes:
     
  6. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When we read what was actually written and compare it to what you claim, we can see that you are either wrong or deceitful. You claim:
    But it actually says that God permitted them to sin.
    So, the Westminster Divines say that God permitted them to sin, indicating He allowed them to do what they wanted to do.

    You change that to God ordering them to sin.

    Either you lack the reading comprehension displayed by my youngest grandson (aged 8) or you are deliberately deceitful. I prayerfully hope it is the former. :(
     
  7. AndyMartin Active Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    31
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is in ENGLISH!

    "God was pleased"

    "to permit, having purposed to order it"
     
  8. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    <Sigh> It is in Early Modern English of the 1600s.

    Pleased
    Plēzd
    Adjective

    (Archaic) willing to do something.

    :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
     
  9. AndyMartin Active Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    31
    Faith:
    Baptist
    give the source
     
  10. AndyMartin Active Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    31
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "happy and satisfied"
     
  11. AndyMartin Active Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    31
    Faith:
    Baptist
  12. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are aware that word meaning (etymology) and word usage (philology) has changed since the 1600s, are you not?

    It is silly to try to apply 21st century meanings to words used in a 17th century document.

    In the 17th century the word "pleased" meant "willing."

    And once again you have publicly displayed your lack of understanding of the issue you are trying to discuss.

    And still have not answered any of my questions. Still dodging and weaving and throwing up a smoke screen?
     
  13. annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    2.2it pleases", "pleased", etc., "someone to do somethingdated It is someone's choice to do something.
    ‘instead of attending the meeting, it pleased him to go off hunting’

    please - definition of please in English | Oxford Dictionaries
     
  14. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
  15. AndyMartin Active Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    31
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I do know. Show me an example from a dictionary that says this? So the word "ordered" also changed? Not according to my Oxford English dictionary that shows no such change
     
  16. AndyMartin Active Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    31
    Faith:
    Baptist
  17. Reformed Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    4,960
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Since this is the Baptist Board, let me quote from the 1689 Second London Baptist Confession of Faith, 6:1:

    It does say "God was pleased, according to his wise and holy counsel to permit, having purposed it to his own glory". No where does it say that God was pleased with sin itself. To say otherwise is to be purposefully obtuse. We see this in Gen. 50:20 when Joseph said to his brothers, "As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive." God was pleased with the final outcome of the evil (sin) that Joseph's brothers committed, not the sin itself. In James 1, James writes to encourage his readers about the trials and persecutions they faced. Many of these trials were undoubtedly caused by sin. James was not happy with the sin, but the blessings that came in spite of the sin. The book of Job is another example. Job's wife supposed that Job was cursed by God (probably because of his sin), and he should curse God and die (Job 2:9). There are more passages I can cite, but something tells me that they will fall on deaf ears of those who have already closed them.
     
  18. AndyMartin Active Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    31
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "pleased, according to his wise and holy counsel, to permit, having purposed to order it"

    Not only "pleased", but also "ordered". This is talking of the fall of man, not God using sin after it entered the world!
     
  19. Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    God allowed them to do their "free will" thing, and he also had purposed and ordained that there would be something glorious come out from it, namely, the Cross of Christ, and Him one day forever dealing with problems of Evil and sin!