BUSH BASHERS

http://www.issues2000.org/2004/George_W__Bush_Abortion.htm </font>[/QUOTE]I never said he walked on water!

 

None of them favoured an absolute abortion ban - so all would approve of the murder of children in some cases, those being rape, incest, and a threat to the life of the mother.

 

Source?

 

If he approves of some abotions, why is he not worthy of "bashing"?

 

See above - for the present President's own words

And I may be wrong about President Reagan.

 

So they were not serial abortionists like the democrats! That is what the dems like to brag about. They don't play favorites, just kill them all, kill them all, the tiny, the short, and the tall [3 months, 6 months, 9 months]. The big ones they drag out feet first and suck out their brains.

 

So only supporting the death of a few is acceptable?

 

What worried me the most about the Clinton years was the attempt to socialize our medical system. I spoke against that to anyone who would listen.

We Republicans have lived through many bad Democrat presidents and ideas. It is a waste of time to get worked up over every little thing. Take the case of Ginsburg's nomination to the Supreme Court. There was nothing likable about her and her communist sympathies but the GOP felt that Clinton was President and why be quixotic? She won 98-0, or something like that. Now I work for a Democrat so I have to try to dodge political conversations at work. The Indiana Democrat Party suffered a big setback in last November's elections.

Matt, do you fight Blair tooth and nail just to be fighting? My guess is that you are too busy. Majority rules and you have to allow the majority to operate. I always remember Dickens, who used to take shorthand the speeches of the debates in Parliament, as you know. He said something to the effect that England would survive in spite of what Parliament did. And C.S. Lewis, another great Brit, said that reading the newspapers everyday was a bad idea because you get pulled into the thinking of the newspapers. So I have found that since there is nothing new under the sun that it is best to read some Scripture everyday.

 

You never seem to recall that it was a REPUBLICAN appointed Supreme Court that passed Roe vs. Wade and made abortion legal. Maybe you belong to that group of stupid right wing extremists who are running this country into the ground (as opposed to tose hamoral, dumb, welfare collecting democrats). Right?

 

The only way you really know something is ugly is by comparing it to something you know is far more attractive.

That's why I'm thankful for Bush bashers.

 

Yep, 'tis true. But conveniently forgotten as time marches on....

 

duplicate--sorry

 

We have some liberals posing as Republicans and some of them have gotten on the supreme court. Earl Warren was the first in a long line of nightmares that seemed reasonable at the time. Sandra Day O'Connor, the pillar of salt, has promised to leave, which I am currently using as a proof for the existence of God.

Bush Bashers have been having a good time lately by trying to force a defeat in Iraq by a withdrawal before complete victory. I won't mention the placing of the blame for the Louisiana disaster on global warming.

 

It's HAARP that's responsible, CMG, for global warming, anyway....

http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/

 

I'm on the side trying to protect America by exposing the corruption in both parties. The corrupt Republican party is just the ones currently at bat. Next on deck is the corrupt Democrat party.

And they are all controlled by corrupt corporate heads, corupt multinational bankers and helped along by a complicit media owned by the corupt corporate heads.

All the while we're arguing about who's fault it is they're getting away with murder and destroying America.

Newsflash... They're all to balme. Neither party is guiltless! Because they all work for the same globalists (parasitical elite) that feed on us.

[ September 09, 2005, 09:01 PM: Message edited by: poncho ]

 

It's HAARP that's responsible, CMG, for global warming, anyway....

http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/ </font>[/QUOTE]Don't you mean AARP?

 

Yeah, yeah, yeah. The Libertarians are for abortion and same-sex marriage. The Greens are for government control of the economy in order to protect the environment. The Constitutions are for immediate withdrawal from Iraq. Sounds to me as if the 3rd parties are worse than either of the 2 major parties.

 

No, I meant HAARP.

They change climate globally. They have the technology to cause drought, etc.

 

Not this libertarian CMG. It's funny how those defending the Republicrats can say in one breath how they (party) are against abortion then in the next say the party has "some liberals" in favor of it.

Smoke and mirrors. Smoke and mirrors.

 

Oh, well I thought that the old folks like me were responsible for all of the problems in the world so I supposed that you meant AARP although I am a card-carrying member of USA Next http://www.usanext.org/

Frankly, considering what they have done with the natural gas supply--namely waste it on making electricity instead of using coal--I am hoping for a great deal of global warming this winter to heat an apartment this far north.

Environmentalists are enemies. At Purdue University they banned smoking outside on the campus. I can't stand them.