Mark:

WEll........ I am just now getting to this and I'd like to remind you granny that TexasSky has apologized not once but twice to me publicly on these boards (go back and read that thread again), and one more time to me privately. She made a mistake and admitted it. So don't be bringing my name into this converstation unless you want ~really want~ me to stand up for the TexasSky because I respect what she has to say even when her word falls into areas that sting. I believe she is God sent here and is here for a reason. Now go puke all you want. Just don't puke with my name in it.

 

I am not a good debater, but it seems to me that in a debate if a person disagrees with a doctrine, that they should tell why they disagree rather than: "There you go again twisting doctrine, telling half truths, etc."

If a person disagrees and thinks that the other person is twisting doctrine, then IMO, I believe that person should state for those who do not find it obvious how they think that the person is twisting doctrine and why they disagree.

I have observed in these threads that when one has asked how the doctrine is twisted that person has been ridiculed.

For the ones who may not understand, please explain how it is wrong and let them decide if it is twisted or not.

Now, I keep reading about the "Full Counsel of God" (Not sure it is in this thread and maybe I need to start a new threat )

But just what do you mean when you say that someone does not know the "Full Counsel of God"?

 

TS, I believe that may be the shortest post I've seen you make on this bulletin board!

 

WEll........ I am just now getting to this and I'd like to remind you granny that TexasSky has apologized not once but twice to me publicly on these boards (go back and read that thread again), and one more time to me privately. She made a mistake and admitted it. So don't be bringing my name into this converstation unless you want ~really want~ me to stand up for the TexasSky because I respect what she has to say even when her word falls into areas that sting. I believe she is God sent here and is here for a reason. Now go puke all you want. Just don't puke with my name in it. </font>[/QUOTE]Since everyone is calling for proof of this and that, I thought I'd better back-up what I had to say.

On the "Throwing Stones" thread, in this forum I went back to read it again myself and have come to the realization that I was in error. I apologize to GrannyGumbo and to all here.

TexasSky did NOT apologize to me twice as I have stated above.

She apologized three times in one post and one time in another post and once again to me privately. Five times constitutes a contrite heart to me, and I have accepted her apologies and offered one of my own in return, for having brought that one thread to the surface from the deep down below. The one that I think may have started this multiple thread disagreement.

And Granny I mean no harm to you personally, but please...... in the future know of what you speak before you speak it or stand to be corrected.

 

Who's "Andy"?

 

"Andy"??? Yeah........ who is Andy???

 

Andy Griffith?

 

No problem, TS.

 

Now THAT truly is the shortest one...

 

Just trying to keep it light...